This is the public portal for all IBM Z Hardware and Operating System related offerings. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
In our installation a variety of different capacity records are used on multiple machines with frequent changes to the activated capacity levels. This makes it cumbersome to reconstruct the active capacity levels for any given point in time, as the change log has to be traced. Another way to access this information more easily and quickly is needed in a highly dynamic environment. A regularly recorded snapshot of all relevant details will be helpful to provide a quick view of the relevant details.
The usage of capacity records is governed by the contract. As such, the correct usage of the available records is mandatory to stay compliant with the contract. Historical recording is required for the customer to provide proof of this compliance.
The mentioned feature would benefit customers, contract managers as well as IBM themselves, as it will be more easy for all parties to check the usage of provided capacity records.
IBM should provide the status of all capacity records in a new SMF record, which is written in the SMF interval. The record should contain at least:
Record ID
Installation Status (Installed/Staged/Active)
Maximum activation levels for all different engine types
Current activation for all engine types
expiration date
date and time of last change of activation levels
This information is not yet available in this format.
In addition, all events regarding capacity records should be recorded in another subtype of the new SMF record. This record should be written as the event occurs. Possible events are at least:
Add
Download
Installation
Activation (=change of activated capacity level)
This subtype would correspond to the information already available in the csv file in resource link.
Idea priority | High |
By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.
Brian Valentine, SE/HMC Development, is available to meet with Simon Bierwald if addition discussion is needed for a BCPii solution.
Currently, part of the information we need is found in a csv file which can be obtained via resource link. There is no information available in SMF yet. The information in the csv only provides changes to the capacity records as they occur, as an "event log". Apart form that, we request a snapshot reporting to be established which provides all neccessary information for the given point in time and is recorded regularly.
Regarding the compliance evidence infrastructure we conclude that this is not suited for our request. This new feature focuses on collecting information from different subsystems on a specific signal (i.e. on demand). Also, this is geard towards providing evidence of compliance to security rules (GDPR et al.). In this request, we are talking about complying with our IBM contract, which is a totally different topic.
Also, are you familiar with the new compliance evidence data collection infrastructure that was recently delivered with APARs OA61443 and OA61444? This sounds like it might fit with that infrastructure.