This is the public portal for all IBM Z Hardware and Operating System related offerings. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
While IBM's strategy is based on encouraging Hybrid Cloud and the integration with Z components with the ecosystem outside of Z and all of these integrations are happening via TCP/IP, and in TFP each MSU consumption means a cost to the customers, I think this will be needed more and more each day. Could not we find any other way to do this other than creating a new thread for each connection? Of course, It may not be that simple, but I believe, there may be an efficient, light-weight solutions that IBM can find. If I am not mistaken, in SMF records, there are statistics separately accounted by different connections although they shared the same threads, or some other vendor products could distinguish statistics like packet count, data size etc based on the connections. So, can't we apply same approach for CPU usage?