Skip to Main Content
IBM Z Hardware and Operating Systems Ideas Portal


This is the public portal for all IBM Z Hardware and Operating System related offerings. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Not under consideration
Workspace z/OS
Created by Guest
Created on Aug 24, 2012

SNTP - correct loop problem

I'm creating this RFE in response to the customer problem reported in the PMR. The customer's SNTP server ended up in a loop with another z/OS SNTP server on another system.

It appears our SNTP can get into a loop sending responses back and forth between two or our SNTP servers when our server receives a packet from another server instead of from a client. I looked at the following SNTP RFCs (each RFC pertains to a specific version of NTP, Version 2 through Version 4):
NTP V2 - RFC1119
NTP V3 - RFC1305
NTP V4 - RFC5095

We say our SNTP is V4 but we don't support associations and we don't support symmetric mode. As far as I can tell, our SNTP function only has the following support:
- Client/Server: receives requests and responds with a timestamp as a server
- Sends out multicast/broadcast packets with a mode of broadcast and a timestamp.

The customer figured out who sent the bad packets and stopped that server so they no longer have the problem. They are not interested in testing a fix.

So we are creating this RFE to fix the problem in a future release. The fix should change the Client/Server support code to only process input requests where:
- the mode is Client or,
- there is no mode value (supposedly this is possible with pre-V2 versions of NTP) and the source port is not 123.

All other input requests would be silently discarded (but we could trace them). There is already code that skips input requests with a mode of broadcast, so maybe we could just update this code. We should also change the IP Config Guide documentation for SNTP to indicate that it does not support symmetric mode.

Idea priority High
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Nov 19, 2015

    Due to processing by IBM, this request was reassigned to have the following updated attributes:
    Brand - Servers and Systems Software
    Product family - z Systems Software
    Product - z/OS Communications Server

    For recording keeping, the previous attributes were:
    Brand - WebSphere
    Product family - Enterprise Networking
    Product - z/OS Communications Server