IBM Z Hardware and Operating Systems Ideas Portal


This is the public portal for all IBM Z Hardware and Operating System related offerings. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

My ideas: BCP_Allocation

Showing 16 of 3553

Allocation should not retry allocating devices that still have tapes mounted on them

We experienced a large number of microcode issues during the unloads of our VTS drives. The result was a tape drive that z/OS thought was unloaded but actually had a tape mounted from the VTS's perspective. Because z/OS and the VTS are 'out of syn...
almost 10 years ago in z/OS / BCP_Allocation 2 Not under consideration

Mount improvement with multi-volume, multi-unit allocation

Prologue: I think this is an issue that needs improvement. I can't find a solution that exists in z/OS - if it does please let me know during discussion of the requirement. I'm posting in MVSE because I believe Allocation belongs to MVSE not MVSS,...
over 5 years ago in z/OS / BCP_Allocation 1 Not under consideration

Better Alert or Avoid having a UserCatalg allocated elsewhere that in the CAS

The customer has got a problem with a UserCatalog he wanted to move, but this UserCatalog was allocatde in the *MASTER* Adress Space
over 6 years ago in z/OS / BCP_Allocation 2 Not under consideration

PGAR0109-1197-Increasing the maximum volume count of 59 per data set

SUBMITTER SECTIONSubmitted by: gulfemo@garanti.com.trSubmitters Company: Garanti Teknoloji PUBLICRequirement Number and Title: PGAR0109-1197-Increasing the maximum volume count of 59 per data setHomework Assigned: NoRequirement Category: Core Tech...
over 9 years ago in z/OS / BCP_Allocation 3 Not under consideration

Ability to suppress IEE252I when using IEFPRMLB

SUBMITTER SECTIONFIT Number: MR101609569User Marketing Field Requirement Number: MR101609569Title: Ability to suppress IEE252I when using IEFPRMLB to read a memberSubmitted By: Shirley Jubinsky/Poughkeepsie/IBMOriginators Area: Allocation Level 2F...
over 10 years ago in z/OS / BCP_Allocation 4 Not under consideration

PBARC0604-706 Dynamic de-allocation of proclib from MSTJCL

SUBMITTER SECTIONSubmitted by: John.RattraySubmitters Company: Barclays BK PUBLICRequirement Number and Title: PBARC0604-706 Dynamic de-allocation of proclib from MSTJCLHomework Assigned: NoRequirement Category: Core TechnologyCurrent Status: Clos...
over 9 years ago in z/OS / BCP_Allocation 3 Not under consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.