Skip to Main Content
IBM Z Hardware and Operating Systems Ideas Portal


This is the public portal for all IBM Z Hardware and Operating System related offerings. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Not under consideration
Workspace z/OS
Categories BCP_Allocation
Created by Guest
Created on Jan 7, 2015

Allocation should not retry allocating devices that still have tapes mounted on them

We experienced a large number of microcode issues during the unloads of our VTS drives. The result was a tape drive that z/OS thought was unloaded but actually had a tape mounted from the VTS's perspective.

Because z/OS and the VTS are 'out of sync' the I/O issued to the drive during the allocation attempt ends up getting timed (IOS error messages seen) out after several minutes resulting in this message:

19:01:22 IEF351I ASSIGN PROCESSING TIMED OUT FOR AUTOSWITCH DEVICE AE06

Losing one single virtual drive is not a big issue. However, this single virtual drive does not get taken out of allocations selection list so we continue to see this same set of error messages across the sysplex for all the tape drive allocations to this specific VTS. Eventually this is noticed and the drive is forced offline which allows allocation to bypass the drive and select another one without issue. However, until the drive is forced offline no tape processing can occur. In some of these circumstances we have ended up getting dangerously close to locking up our systems due to DB2 or MQ being unable to unload their logs. Had those applications been more active we would have ended up locking up these major subsystems due to a single failed tape drive.

While the technical fix in this case is a newer set of microcode we believe that z/OS allocation should be enhanced to automatically bypass this single logical drive in cases where repetitive errors are being seen. This is especially criticial with ATS (Automatic Tape Switching) since the whole sysplex can end up being locked up until an operator action is taken.

Idea priority Medium
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Mar 7, 2024
    This item is unlikely to be given high enough priority to be placed into the product plan.
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jan 8, 2015

    Creating a new RFE based on Community RFE #64077 in product z/OS.