Skip to Main Content
IBM Z Hardware and Operating Systems Ideas Portal


This is the public portal for all IBM Z Hardware and Operating System related offerings. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Not under consideration
Workspace z/OS
Categories BCP_Allocation
Created by Guest
Created on Jul 15, 2019

Mount improvement with multi-volume, multi-unit allocation

Prologue: I think this is an issue that needs improvement. I can't find a solution that exists in z/OS - if it does please let me know during discussion of the requirement. I'm posting in MVSE because I believe Allocation belongs to MVSE not MVSS, even though this issue is mostly encountered with tape (virtual or real) allocation.

Requirement: when using multiple devices in the UNIT parameter and concatenated datasets, mounts should be done for the consolidated list of volumes (explicitly listed or via the catalog) in the concatenation.

Example of the problem: A job that reads concatenated tape datasets which are usually multi-volume uses UNIT=(,2) to allow mounts and I/O to overlap (and, on virtual tape systems, to allow virtual volume recall to happen while I/O happens). If the first dataset has only one volume, the system will mount that volume and issue a mount for PRIVAT on the second device. The mount for the first volume of the second dataset is delayed until the end of I/O for the first dataset rather than occurring while the first (only) volume of the first dataset is being read. This results in wasted elapsed time. I believe this is true not just for the first dataset but for any dataset where the number of volumes is less than the number of devices.

This problem can show up after migration of large sequential datasets to different media or compression where a dataset used to occupy multiple volumes and now occupies one.

Comments posted:

Tim Hare
Posted: May 03, 2019 11:17 PM
Mount improvement with multi-volume, multi-unit allocation

-------------------------

I should add, I suppose, though it might be being overly obvious, that this improvement is for disposition OLD/SHR, i.e. the input side of things.

I also have not tried this with DEFER, but will soon.

-------------------------

Tim Hare
Posted: May 05, 2019 06:32 PM
Mount improvement with multi-volume, multi-unit allocation

-------------------------

Behavior with DEFER is different. There is no mount of a PRIVATE volume, but the mount of the first volume of the second dataset in concatenation does not happen until after the first dataset has been read. This happens whether UNIT=AFF=dd1 is coded on the second DD, or if the second DD has its own UNIT=(,2,DEFER)

-------------------------

Stan W Abramczyk, Jr
Posted: Jun 10, 2019 04:12 PM
Mount improvement with multi-volume, multi-unit allocation

-------------------------

I'm in agreement , the system should create a consolidated list of the volumes in the concatenation to be mounted in order, and issue mounts for the first 'n' volumes in that list where 'n' is the number of devices in the UNIT parameter.

Idea priority Low
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Mar 7, 2024
    This item is unlikely to be given high enough priority to be placed into the product plan.