This is the public portal for all IBM Z Hardware and Operating System related offerings. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
When issuing a RACF command such as ADDUSER or ADDGROUP RACF issues misleading messages when the user or group exists. Additional misleading messages can also be issued about OMVS.
For instance, when DFSGRP exists:
ADDGROUP DFSGRP SUPGROUP(SYS1) OMVS(GID(3))
IKJ56702I INVALID GROUP, DFSGRP
IKJ56701I MISSING OMVS GID+
IKJ56701I MISSING OMVS GROUP ID (GID), 1-10 NUMERIC DIGITS
Or in this case, when user ZFS exists:
ADDUSER ZFS DFLTGRP(ZFSGRP) AUTHORITY(CREATE) OMVS(UID(0)
IKJ56702I INVALID USERID, ZFS
IKJ56701I MISSING OMVS UID+
IKJ56701I MISSING OMVS USER ID (UID), 1-10 NUMERIC DIGITS
These messages are very troublesome when running jobs such as the ServerPac RACFDRV job since every instance (and there can be many) of these messages due to existing definitions needs to be checked.
This was initially raised as an APARable defect but apparently is WAD, so hence the RFE.
Idea priority | Medium |
By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.
You would expect to see 'duplicate user' or 'user already defined' as with every other operating system.
Thank you for the feedback. Requirement is recognized.
Yes, I think that would be ok. I appreciate your concern about removing messages.
Thank you for submitting this requirement. We certainly agree that misleading messages should be avoided.
Just to better understand your situation -- Your policy is to investigate all RACF IKJ56702I messages? Would it be acceptable if RACF issue a subsequent IRR message to indicate 'duplicate user' or 'user already defined'? It is difficult for us to remove messages as some customers have processes or automation that rely on them.