This is the public portal for all IBM Z Hardware and Operating System related offerings. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
We had issues with some Jobs, running hours than minutes (also on CPUTime), as it raises on every call to a submodule, an (internal) application error (and at last, ignores it). The (internal) error is managed by our error-handling, which called CEETBCK.
As we changed from COBOL V4 to COBOL V6, we activated NOTEST(DWARF) to get more information on CEEDUMP. But just found out, CEETBCK needs alot more CPU.
We don't need statement_id, so we would be very happy, if this idea is released.
Thank you.
Would be helpful. The older CEETRCB is only there for compatibility reasons. CEETBCK is the recommended method, but at the moment with more overhead.