This is the public portal for all IBM Z Hardware and Operating System related offerings. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
Thank you for your comment and suggestion. In this situation, the userid belongs to a started task. Information Security does not assign a TSO segment to started tasks to limit the risk of the elevated privileges of the userid from being exploited.
There is also no ALIAS for the userid, and that results in an attempt to catalog the data set in the master catalog (resulting in a security violation, as we protect the master catalog from update). If we were to define it, we'd need to manage the data set, as the started task performs many ALU commands per day.
An ability to suppress the RRSFLIST seems to me to be a better approach.
Have you considered setting a TSO prefix for the userid, then granting permission to that prefixed file? Are the messages that RRSF issues in the same scenario also a problem? Thank you.