Skip to Main Content
IBM Z Hardware and Operating Systems Ideas Portal


This is the public portal for all IBM Z Hardware and Operating System related offerings. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Not under consideration
Workspace z/OS
Categories BCP_SMF
Created by Guest
Created on Jul 22, 2024

Automated SMF Collection based on PARMLIB setting or z/OSMF Settings Plugin

SMF collection on z/OS does not establish a standard HLQ or dataset naming conventions for SMF collection and history. Basically every shop has their own process of collecting SMF which involves customization of z/OS exits to capture when the data is ready to be offloaded (MAN datasets full or logstream ready to offload) data which makes it impossible for z/OSMF or other system tools to "guess" or identify where the data is and contributes to non standardized environments.

The idea is to use the SMFPRMxx parmlib member not only to tell how we want to separate the SMF data, but also to define the naming convention for the collected SMF data so that z/OS could handle the collection process automatically.

For example when collecting from a logstream you have this :

ACTIVE

DEFAULTLSNAME(IFASMF.&SYSPLEX..DFLT) 
      LSNAME(IFASMF.&SYSPLEX..CICS,TYPE(110)), 
      LSNAME(IFASMF.&SYSPLEX..DB2,TYPE(100,101,102)), 
      LSNAME(IFASMF.&SYSPLEX..DSN,TYPE(14,15,17,18,36,42,60:69)), 
      LSNAME(IFASMF.&SYSPLEX..MISC,TYPE(0:13,16,19:35,37:41,43:49, 
      51:59,84:98,103:109,111:114,120:255)), 
      LSNAME(IFASMF.&SYSPLEX..NETW,TYPE(50,115:119)), 
      LSNAME(IFASMF.&SYSPLEX..RMF,TYPE(70:79)), 
      LSNAME(IFASMF.&SYSPLEX..SEC,TYPE(80:83))

There could be a section for the history SMF :

HISTORY

      DSNAME(IFASMF.&SYSPLEX..CICS..&DDMMYY,TYPE(110)), 
      DSNAME(IFASMF.&SYSPLEX..DB2.&DDMMYY,TYPE(100,101,102)), 
      DSNAME(IFASMF.&SYSPLEX..DSN.&DDMMYY,TYPE(14,15,17,18,36,42,60:69)), 
      DSNAME(IFASMF.&SYSPLEX..MISC.&DDMMYY,TYPE(0:13,16,19:35,37:41,43:49, 
      51:59,84:98,103:109,111:114,120:255)), 
      DSNAME(IFASMF.&SYSPLEX..NETW.&DDMMYY,TYPE(50,115:119)), 
      DSNAME(IFASMF.&SYSPLEX..RMF.&DDMMYY,TYPE(70:79)), 
      DSNAME(IFASMF.&SYSPLEX..SEC.&DDMMYY,TYPE(80:83))

For instance, considering the section above, z/OS would initiate the offload of SMF data to the defined datasets automatically and not depend on external schedulers/automation to accomplish collection. In the above example I've added &DDMMYY so that z/OS writes these datasets appending the time/date, an option could be provided to write directly to GDGs.

Idea priority Low
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Aug 8, 2024
    This item is unlikely to be given high enough priority to be placed into the product plan.