Skip to Main Content
IBM Z Hardware and Operating Systems Ideas Portal


This is the public portal for all IBM Z Hardware and Operating System related offerings. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Not under consideration
Workspace z/OS
Created by Guest
Created on Aug 5, 2013

Update to EE PATH REDIAL mechanism requested

We currently have a small number of EE connections to external clients. Generally our primary and alternate NOI CPs connect to the primary and alternate remote CPs in a full mesh configuration. In our Switched Major node, we code dual (sometimes multiple) PATH statements with the intention that if one path is inaccessible, the connection attempt will drop through to the second or third etc.) path statement. Because we don't want to rely on external automation, we code REDIAL=FOREVER, which will cause indefinite retries.

We have recently become aware that REDIAL=FOREVER on the PATH statement means that the connection attempt (the VARY DIAL) will never drop through to subordinate path statements, but will only retry the first PATH statement in the list indefinitely.

Conversely, if we code a value in REDIAL, the VARY DIAL attempt will only ever make one pass of all the PATH statements before giving up.

So there is something of a Catch-22 going on here; if we want to fully exercise all the PATH statements we have coded, and make use of the resilience we have designed in, we run the risk of the switched major node dropping into a CONCT status and requiring manual activation (we only permit dial out on external EE connections).

If we try and ensure that CP-CP session activation attempts never stop retrying (using REDIAL=FOREVER) we will only ever try the first PATH statement coded and are unable to make use of the resilience we have designed in.

What is really required is an additional operand (on the PU statement, I would surmise) that gives us the option of re-driving the VARY DIAL
process (indefinitely, if required) once the REDIAL limit has been reached. That way we have the option of exercising all PATH statements in the deck (to cater for failed paths, where other paths are available) without having to manually re-drive the VARY DIAL.

What makes it worse is that there is no apparent message written to the log indicating that the PATH number x REDIAL value has been reached, and VARY DIAL activity retries have ceased. At least in that situation it would be comparatively simple to automate on appearance of a particular message in the log. As it is, we seem to have the worst of all worlds.

Could this be taken forward as a possible enhancement for future versions of CS? Even better would be a PTF to retro-fit to current versions...

Idea priority Medium
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jul 8, 2021

    It is unlikely that this RFE can be addressed within the next two release cycles, so it is being rejected.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Nov 19, 2015

    Due to processing by IBM, this request was reassigned to have the following updated attributes:
    Brand - Servers and Systems Software
    Product family - z Systems Software
    Product - z/OS Communications Server

    For recording keeping, the previous attributes were:
    Brand - WebSphere
    Product family - Enterprise Networking
    Product - z/OS Communications Server